This is the eighth in a series of postings on the policy proposal of the two major Senatorial candidates, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and former WWE Executive Linda McMahon.
The eighth topic is Miscellaneous Issues. Each candidate had some issue statements that are not complemented by the other candidate. This posting will present those issues from each candidate. Since “Senator” McMahon was first last time, “Senator” Blumenthal leads off this eighth part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements. That makes for a much shorter presentation.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
Protecting Children & Families
In the Senate, I will continue to stand up for children and families and take on the special interests in key fights:
Keeping Kids Safe Online
As your Senator, I will work for new rules that keep pace with technology and protect our children online. The laws regulating internet pornographers and predators are badly outdated.
Standing Up to Big Tobacco
As your Senator, I will fight to ensure that the tobacco companies are not able to undermine the authority the FDA needs to protect our children.
Keeping Unsafe Toys Off the Shelves
In the Senate, I will keep working to protect our kids from toxic chemicals in toys… As your United States Senator, I will work to expand and tighten toxic chemical standards to better protect us all, and especially our kids.
Ending Domestic Violence
I will take my fight all the way to the U.S. Senate, standing up to the special interests threatening our kids and our families.
Seniors
As Connecticut’s U.S. Senator, I will fight to honor the hard work and service of our senior citizens, and the obligations we’ve made to them.
Protecting Seniors from Fraud.
Ensuring Access to Medicare Benefits
Fighting Deceptive Advertising
As your U.S. Senator, these would be my priorities:
Protecting Medicare and Social Security… I support aggressive measures to reduce waste, fraud and abuse in all federal spending. But I will not and do not support any effort to balance the budget on the backs of our seniors.
Reforming Nursing Homes. .. our nursing home regulations are inadequate, inconsistent, and ineffective. I’ve testified before Congress advocating stringent national efforts to reduce corruption and abuse, and to improve the quality of care provided in nursing homes. As a U.S. Senator, I will work to enact those proposed reforms.
Negotiating Prescription Drug Prices. If we’re serious about cutting health care costs, we’ve got to get serious about negotiating down drug prices.
Prohibiting Drug Company Exploitation of Dual Eligibles.
Ending the Medicare Part D “Donut Hole”.
Building a National “Silver Alert” System… In the U.S. Senate, I will push for legislation establishing a standardized national alert system to ensure we can always respond rapidly to a loved one’s disappearance.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
Fiscal Discipline - “Deficit spending must end.”
As Senator, I would support a balanced budget Amendment to the Constitution because in the alternative, endless budget deficits and unthinkable debt will cause long-term damage to the economy.
Deficit spending must end. You can’t spend your way out of debt. Fiscal discipline — true fiscal discipline — means not only cutting taxes but also reducing spending.
Bailouts -“The ‘Culture of Bailouts’ must end.”
It is time we immediately shut down TARP and use all unspent or paid-back portions of the program to pay down the debt. I oppose the use of TARP funds for public programs, subsidies and bailouts.
The President has proposed a new tax on banks to recoup roughly $120 billion in TARP funds, even though the majority of TARP funds that went to banks have already been paid back. Most of the funds that were not recouped were used to bail out AIG, GM, Chrysler, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — none of whom should have been bailed out to begin with. I oppose this proposal because it raises taxes during a recession and it will make it more expensive for people and businesses to borrow money as banks pass those added costs onto consumers.
Card Check
I’m opposed to Card Check legislation because I believe the private ballot must be protected and I’m opposed to giving government bureaucrats control of the workplace. Workers should continue to have the protection of a secret ballot. It prevents unions from intimidating workers, and it ensures a fair outcome for both workers and employers.
Death Penalty
I support current state law on the death penalty, which allows for capital punishment.
Illegal Immigration
I support legal immigration and I believe much of this country’s strength and prosperity has come as a result of the immense contributions immigrants have made. We have historically welcomed the best workers and the best minds from every country, and I believe we should continue to do so provided it is done legally. We are a nation built on the rule of law, and immigration laws — like all laws — must be enforced. While I believe immigration reform is needed, I believe reform starts with securing the border. Border enforcement should be followed by interior enforcement and a revamp of the visa process. I’m opposed to amnesty.
Second Amendment
America has a long history of gun ownership, and I fully support 2nd Amendment rights.
Comments
It is interesting to see which topics each candidate chose that was not the same as the other. “Senator” Blumenthal focused on children and seniors while “Senator” McMahon focused on conservative hot button issues such as fiscal discipline, Union “Card Check”, the death penalty, illegal immigration, and second amendment rights. These topics show a very different emphasis by the candidates. Which one do you want in the Senate?
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Blumenthal & McMahon – The Issues – Part VII– Women
This is the seventh in a series of postings on the policy proposal of the two major Senatorial candidates, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and former WWE Executive Linda McMahon.
The seventh topic is Women’s Issues. Since “Senator” Blumenthal was first last time, “Senator” McMahon leads off this seventh part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements. That makes for a much shorter presentation.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
Abortion
I am pro-choice; however, I oppose partial-birth abortion and federal funding of abortions unless the life of the mother is at stake. I’m in favor of parental notification/parental consent legislation.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
Whether it is women’s health, equality in the workplace, or protecting a woman’s right to choose, as a U.S. Senator, I will be a fierce advocate for women.
Supporting Choice and Reproductive Rights.
I will fight to protect a woman’s right to choose and ensure that abortion remains safe, legal and rare.
Improving Women’s Health Care.
I believe that public officials can help advance women’s health care and ensure that the particular medical issues that affect women receive the attention they require… I support increasing funding to research the cancers that affect women and efforts to increase research and awareness of women’s heart health.
Ensuring Equality in the Workplace.
Although the treatment of women in the workplace has improved significantly, I believe there are still far too many cases of discrimination, sexual harassment, and pay inequity… As a U.S. Senator, I will work to permanently close the wage gap, expand career opportunities for women, and prevent sexual harassment.
Standing Up Against Domestic Violence.
In the Senate, I will be a tireless advocate for expanding and fully funding The Violence Against Women Act to ensure that law enforcement has the tools it needs to keep families safe.
Comments
While “Senator” McMahon mentions only a woman’s right to choose, “Senator” Blumenthal has a more expanded treatment of women’s issues from health care to the work place, to domestic violence. Which candidate best reflects the reader’s stand on this important topic?
The seventh topic is Women’s Issues. Since “Senator” Blumenthal was first last time, “Senator” McMahon leads off this seventh part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements. That makes for a much shorter presentation.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
Abortion
I am pro-choice; however, I oppose partial-birth abortion and federal funding of abortions unless the life of the mother is at stake. I’m in favor of parental notification/parental consent legislation.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
Whether it is women’s health, equality in the workplace, or protecting a woman’s right to choose, as a U.S. Senator, I will be a fierce advocate for women.
Supporting Choice and Reproductive Rights.
I will fight to protect a woman’s right to choose and ensure that abortion remains safe, legal and rare.
Improving Women’s Health Care.
I believe that public officials can help advance women’s health care and ensure that the particular medical issues that affect women receive the attention they require… I support increasing funding to research the cancers that affect women and efforts to increase research and awareness of women’s heart health.
Ensuring Equality in the Workplace.
Although the treatment of women in the workplace has improved significantly, I believe there are still far too many cases of discrimination, sexual harassment, and pay inequity… As a U.S. Senator, I will work to permanently close the wage gap, expand career opportunities for women, and prevent sexual harassment.
Standing Up Against Domestic Violence.
In the Senate, I will be a tireless advocate for expanding and fully funding The Violence Against Women Act to ensure that law enforcement has the tools it needs to keep families safe.
Comments
While “Senator” McMahon mentions only a woman’s right to choose, “Senator” Blumenthal has a more expanded treatment of women’s issues from health care to the work place, to domestic violence. Which candidate best reflects the reader’s stand on this important topic?
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Himes, Courtney, Slip Sliding Away
Dennis House’s “The Hartforite" is reporting that Jim Himes and Joe Courtney, two representatives in districts less liberal than Speaker of the U.S. House Nancy Pelosi, are inching away from Bethlehem:
“During a taping of Face the State, when I asked both Congressmen Jim Himes and Joe Courtney if they would endorse Pelosi for another term as their leader, they balked.
Neither were conspicuously present during President Barack Obama's visit to Connecticut in mid-September.
“During a taping of Face the State, when I asked both Congressmen Jim Himes and Joe Courtney if they would endorse Pelosi for another term as their leader, they balked.
Neither were conspicuously present during President Barack Obama's visit to Connecticut in mid-September.
“The two are running for re-election in districts where Mr. Obama’s approval rating has fallen and unemployment is high. With an electorate becoming increasingly frustrated with Washington, Himes and Courtney are both stressing to voters that they are ‘independent voices.‘”The word “independent,” a curtsey in the direction of the Tea Party Patriots and Independents who have expressed their dissatisfaction with the two major parties, is one we shall be hearing often on a campaign trail that, some believe, will lead to a valley of tears in November.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Blumenthal & McMahon – The Issues – Part VI– Veterans
This is the sixth in a series of postings on the policy proposal of the two major Senatorial candidates, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and former WWE Executive Linda McMahon.
The sixth topic is Veteran’s Affairs. Since “Senator” McMahon was first last time, “Senator” Blumenthal leads off this sixth part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
I have called for a comprehensive “No Veteran Left Behind” program to ensure that the depth of our country’s commitment to our veterans reflects the depth of their sacrifices on our behalf. My ideas include:
Modernize the Veterans Administration.
Improve the Claims Processing System and End the Backlog.
Accelerate Appeals.
Transition to Electronic Medical Records.
Streamline Military-to-VA Transition
Secure Job Opportunities for our Veterans. We must do everything we can to help returning veterans secure jobs and transition to civilian work.
New Incentives to Hire Veterans.
Support for Veteran Entrepreneurship.
Improve Veteran Health Care and Mental Health Services.
Improve Mental Health Services. Congress must provide the VA and the Department of Defense (DOD) with adequate funding and authority to recruit and retain critically needed behavioral health specialists. And we must make sure that both active military personnel and veterans have adequate access to mental health services.
Reduce the Stigma of Mental Health Services.
Provide Training and Higher Education.
Provide GI Bill Benefits for Vocational Programs.
Speed up Payments.
Support for Women Veterans.
Improving Women’s Health. The VA should increase funding for the hiring of female medical practitioners, especially those who specialize in women’s healthcare.
Reducing Sexual Assault. The VA should identify, track and report to Congress the outcomes of claims involving sexual assault and sexual harassment, including data on denial rates, length of processing time, and the types of related disabilities reported.
End Veteran Homelessness. I support expanding the HUD-VA Supportive Housing voucher program, extending its availability to reach all homeless veterans, and providing Section 8 vouchers to veterans in need of permanent housing.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
-“…We owe them our respect and support in return for their service.”
As Senator, I will work to ensure that the promises our government made to veterans, including health care, disability compensation, pensions and GI Bill benefits, are fulfilled.
Comments
“Senator” Blumenthal is more specific in how he would support veterans. “Senator” McMahon’s one statement does not provide much detail on how she will support veteran’s issues.
The sixth topic is Veteran’s Affairs. Since “Senator” McMahon was first last time, “Senator” Blumenthal leads off this sixth part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
I have called for a comprehensive “No Veteran Left Behind” program to ensure that the depth of our country’s commitment to our veterans reflects the depth of their sacrifices on our behalf. My ideas include:
Modernize the Veterans Administration.
Improve the Claims Processing System and End the Backlog.
Accelerate Appeals.
Transition to Electronic Medical Records.
Streamline Military-to-VA Transition
Secure Job Opportunities for our Veterans. We must do everything we can to help returning veterans secure jobs and transition to civilian work.
New Incentives to Hire Veterans.
Support for Veteran Entrepreneurship.
Improve Veteran Health Care and Mental Health Services.
Improve Mental Health Services. Congress must provide the VA and the Department of Defense (DOD) with adequate funding and authority to recruit and retain critically needed behavioral health specialists. And we must make sure that both active military personnel and veterans have adequate access to mental health services.
Reduce the Stigma of Mental Health Services.
Provide Training and Higher Education.
Provide GI Bill Benefits for Vocational Programs.
Speed up Payments.
Support for Women Veterans.
Improving Women’s Health. The VA should increase funding for the hiring of female medical practitioners, especially those who specialize in women’s healthcare.
Reducing Sexual Assault. The VA should identify, track and report to Congress the outcomes of claims involving sexual assault and sexual harassment, including data on denial rates, length of processing time, and the types of related disabilities reported.
End Veteran Homelessness. I support expanding the HUD-VA Supportive Housing voucher program, extending its availability to reach all homeless veterans, and providing Section 8 vouchers to veterans in need of permanent housing.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
-“…We owe them our respect and support in return for their service.”
As Senator, I will work to ensure that the promises our government made to veterans, including health care, disability compensation, pensions and GI Bill benefits, are fulfilled.
Comments
“Senator” Blumenthal is more specific in how he would support veterans. “Senator” McMahon’s one statement does not provide much detail on how she will support veteran’s issues.
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Blumenthal & McMahon – The Issues – Part V– Energy & Environment
This is the fifth in a series of postings on the policy proposal of the two major Senatorial candidates, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and former WWE Executive Linda McMahon.
The fifth topic is Energy and Environment. Since “Senator” Blumenthal was first last time, “Senator” McMahon leads off this fifth part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
“I oppose cap-and-trade because it will increase energy costs and Connecticut already pays the highest electricity rates in the continental U.S.”
I support efforts to develop and expand alternatives and renewable forms of energy including solar, wind, hydro, nuclear and natural gas. I believe dependence on foreign oil supplies is unsustainable in the long-term, and I believe it creates national security risks. I support environmentally responsible domestic oil exploration offshore, but I believe states should decide whether to allow drilling in their waters.
I oppose cap-and-trade legislation because it will increase energy costs and Connecticut already pays the highest electricity rates in the continental U.S.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
BUILDING GREEN MANUFACTURING
Promoting Investments in Clean Energy Technology I support increasing our investment in clean-energy technologies, which will help create as many as 2.5 million new jobs, boost the economy, and improve the environment
Investing in Domestic Clean Energy Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability. I strongly support proposals like the Investments for Manufacturing Progress and Clean Technology ("IMPACT") Act. The act would help small and medium sized local manufacturers by providing loans to improve their facilities and expand clean energy product production.
Establish Clean Energy Business Zones. Establishing Clean Energy Business Zones (CBiZ) will help our businesses and manufacturers transition from fossil fuels to clean energy. Businesses in newly established Clean Energy Business Zones would receive up to $1.2 billion per year in tax credits, grants and loan guarantees for companies in the clean energy sector or for companies that move to greater energy efficiency.
IMPROVING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Creating Incentives for Residential Efficiency Retrofitting. I support the Home Star Energy Retrofit Act (or "Cash for Caulkers") program which will combine financial incentives and uniform federal energy efficiency standards to dramatically extend efforts to improve residential energy efficiency.
Establishing Cash for Commercial Clunkers. Old, inefficient “heavy-load vehicles” are major gas guzzlers and polluters. I believe we should establish a program that would pay up to $65,000 per vehicle to get old diesel trucks off the road and replace them with natural gas and alternative fuel vehicles while spurring job-creating demand for vehicles and fueling stations.
Curbing Pollution. As your U.S. Senator, I will listen to ideas from anyone, regardless of party, on how to bring the financial costs, environmental destruction and adverse health consequences caused by polluters under control.
PROTECTING THE SOUND.
• In the U.S. Senate, I will push to hold big energy companies accountable for the potential consequences of their activities, and ensure that further energy development occurs in a responsible manner. I have also joined with Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, local officials and environmental advocates to ask Congress to do more to protect Long Island Sound.
• As your U.S. Senator, I will remain a fighter standing up to any special interest or effort that would put the Sound at risk. Clear action is needed, especially to confront the cause and consequences of the Gulf oil spill this past spring.
• As Senator, I will continue to fight to make Connecticut a leader in clean energy technologies and the jobs they provide, while ensuring our environment and shores remain safe for Connecticut families.
• As your U.S. Senator, I will work to promote the green economy of the 21st century while simultaneously protecting and preserving Connecticut’s environment for generations to come.
Comments
“Senator” McMahon has a narrow energy and environment policy. She is against ‘Cap and Trade” and in favor of off shore drilling if the state agrees. She also supports “alternative energy” projects. “Senator” Blumenthal has a well developed energy and environmental program that attempts to balance environmental concerns with sustainable energy. Which program suits your stand on energy and the environment?
The fifth topic is Energy and Environment. Since “Senator” Blumenthal was first last time, “Senator” McMahon leads off this fifth part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
“I oppose cap-and-trade because it will increase energy costs and Connecticut already pays the highest electricity rates in the continental U.S.”
I support efforts to develop and expand alternatives and renewable forms of energy including solar, wind, hydro, nuclear and natural gas. I believe dependence on foreign oil supplies is unsustainable in the long-term, and I believe it creates national security risks. I support environmentally responsible domestic oil exploration offshore, but I believe states should decide whether to allow drilling in their waters.
I oppose cap-and-trade legislation because it will increase energy costs and Connecticut already pays the highest electricity rates in the continental U.S.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
BUILDING GREEN MANUFACTURING
Promoting Investments in Clean Energy Technology I support increasing our investment in clean-energy technologies, which will help create as many as 2.5 million new jobs, boost the economy, and improve the environment
Investing in Domestic Clean Energy Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability. I strongly support proposals like the Investments for Manufacturing Progress and Clean Technology ("IMPACT") Act. The act would help small and medium sized local manufacturers by providing loans to improve their facilities and expand clean energy product production.
Establish Clean Energy Business Zones. Establishing Clean Energy Business Zones (CBiZ) will help our businesses and manufacturers transition from fossil fuels to clean energy. Businesses in newly established Clean Energy Business Zones would receive up to $1.2 billion per year in tax credits, grants and loan guarantees for companies in the clean energy sector or for companies that move to greater energy efficiency.
IMPROVING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Creating Incentives for Residential Efficiency Retrofitting. I support the Home Star Energy Retrofit Act (or "Cash for Caulkers") program which will combine financial incentives and uniform federal energy efficiency standards to dramatically extend efforts to improve residential energy efficiency.
Establishing Cash for Commercial Clunkers. Old, inefficient “heavy-load vehicles” are major gas guzzlers and polluters. I believe we should establish a program that would pay up to $65,000 per vehicle to get old diesel trucks off the road and replace them with natural gas and alternative fuel vehicles while spurring job-creating demand for vehicles and fueling stations.
Curbing Pollution. As your U.S. Senator, I will listen to ideas from anyone, regardless of party, on how to bring the financial costs, environmental destruction and adverse health consequences caused by polluters under control.
PROTECTING THE SOUND.
• In the U.S. Senate, I will push to hold big energy companies accountable for the potential consequences of their activities, and ensure that further energy development occurs in a responsible manner. I have also joined with Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, local officials and environmental advocates to ask Congress to do more to protect Long Island Sound.
• As your U.S. Senator, I will remain a fighter standing up to any special interest or effort that would put the Sound at risk. Clear action is needed, especially to confront the cause and consequences of the Gulf oil spill this past spring.
• As Senator, I will continue to fight to make Connecticut a leader in clean energy technologies and the jobs they provide, while ensuring our environment and shores remain safe for Connecticut families.
• As your U.S. Senator, I will work to promote the green economy of the 21st century while simultaneously protecting and preserving Connecticut’s environment for generations to come.
Comments
“Senator” McMahon has a narrow energy and environment policy. She is against ‘Cap and Trade” and in favor of off shore drilling if the state agrees. She also supports “alternative energy” projects. “Senator” Blumenthal has a well developed energy and environmental program that attempts to balance environmental concerns with sustainable energy. Which program suits your stand on energy and the environment?
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Blumenthal & McMahon – The Issues – Part IV– Foreign Policy and National Security
This is the fourth in a series of postings on the policy proposal of the two major Senatorial candidates, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and former WWE Executive Linda McMahon.
The fourth topic is Foreign Policy and National Security. Since “Senator” McMahon was first last time, “Senator” Blumenthal leads off this fourth part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
Pursuing Terrorist Networks Abroad. It is vital that we maintain a strong offensive posture in the struggle against extremism. We must use both military and non-military methods to target and attack the terrorists where they are; never allowing them to establish safe havens in which to plot, plan and train. This includes targeting Al Qaeda’s organizations in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen as well as its affiliates like Al-Shabaab in Somalia.
Improving Homeland Security. Congress and the Administration must do more to meet the threats of today’s information age by improving information sharing, and by bringing together the best technology and the most effective management strategies to get people working across agencies to collect and understand information better. And we must strengthen cyber security, with the government and the private sector working together to find the most effective solutions.
Convicting Terrorists. We must ensure that our judicial system has the tools it needs to prosecute those who try to attack the United States. Both civilian courts and military tribunals have long been a part of our judicial system. Properly constituted, military tribunals are an appropriate venue in which to try accused terrorists under certain circumstances.
Building Alliances Abroad. The rise of future extremist movements can ultimately be curbed only by equipping and training our allies in the fight against Al Qaeda.
Ending our Commitment in Iraq. I support the Administration’s plan to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq by the end of August 2010… While American troops remain, the United States must use its influence to encourage Iraq’s leaders to settle disputes peacefully and within the legal framework they have established under the Iraqi Constitution.
Pursuing Clear, Limited Goals in Afghanistan. Our commitment in Afghanistan must not be open ended. Our troops are scheduled to begin coming home in July 2011 and I would insist on adhering to this exit strategy.
Containing Iran. As a United States Senator, I would support the current structure of sanctions on Iran, and work to increase the pressure on the Iranian regime until it relinquishes its aspirations for nuclear weapons. Some of the actions I would support include gaining international support for an arms embargo, targeted travel bans, the freezing of assets, and sanctions designed to impede the flow of refined petroleum products into Iran.
Supporting Israel. As a U.S. Senator, I will work to advance all the facets of the unique and historic partnership between Israel and the United States.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
“Our troops have to know that we are committed to their success.”
I believe that we should have a strong national defense second to none.
We must fight the terrorists abroad rather than at home.
We cannot ignore the risks inherent in allowing Afghanistan to become a haven for terrorists. It’s my hope that we can bring our troops home safely as soon as possible, but we should bring them home in victory, not defeat.
I’m opposed to trying terrorists in civilian court and I disagree with Attorney General Holder’s decision to try 9/11 terrorist mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed in a civilian court rather than in a military tribunal. A military tribunal trial will better protect sensitive national security information.
Comments
“Senator” Blumenthal appears to cover more ground in his foreign policy and national security issues than “Senator” McMahon. There is agreement in bringing troops home but McMahon leaves the start of that process undefined while Blumenthal supports the current administration strategy.
The fourth topic is Foreign Policy and National Security. Since “Senator” McMahon was first last time, “Senator” Blumenthal leads off this fourth part of the series. In both presentations, I have cut out some of the background and only left in the action statements.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
Pursuing Terrorist Networks Abroad. It is vital that we maintain a strong offensive posture in the struggle against extremism. We must use both military and non-military methods to target and attack the terrorists where they are; never allowing them to establish safe havens in which to plot, plan and train. This includes targeting Al Qaeda’s organizations in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen as well as its affiliates like Al-Shabaab in Somalia.
Improving Homeland Security. Congress and the Administration must do more to meet the threats of today’s information age by improving information sharing, and by bringing together the best technology and the most effective management strategies to get people working across agencies to collect and understand information better. And we must strengthen cyber security, with the government and the private sector working together to find the most effective solutions.
Convicting Terrorists. We must ensure that our judicial system has the tools it needs to prosecute those who try to attack the United States. Both civilian courts and military tribunals have long been a part of our judicial system. Properly constituted, military tribunals are an appropriate venue in which to try accused terrorists under certain circumstances.
Building Alliances Abroad. The rise of future extremist movements can ultimately be curbed only by equipping and training our allies in the fight against Al Qaeda.
Ending our Commitment in Iraq. I support the Administration’s plan to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq by the end of August 2010… While American troops remain, the United States must use its influence to encourage Iraq’s leaders to settle disputes peacefully and within the legal framework they have established under the Iraqi Constitution.
Pursuing Clear, Limited Goals in Afghanistan. Our commitment in Afghanistan must not be open ended. Our troops are scheduled to begin coming home in July 2011 and I would insist on adhering to this exit strategy.
Containing Iran. As a United States Senator, I would support the current structure of sanctions on Iran, and work to increase the pressure on the Iranian regime until it relinquishes its aspirations for nuclear weapons. Some of the actions I would support include gaining international support for an arms embargo, targeted travel bans, the freezing of assets, and sanctions designed to impede the flow of refined petroleum products into Iran.
Supporting Israel. As a U.S. Senator, I will work to advance all the facets of the unique and historic partnership between Israel and the United States.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
“Our troops have to know that we are committed to their success.”
I believe that we should have a strong national defense second to none.
We must fight the terrorists abroad rather than at home.
We cannot ignore the risks inherent in allowing Afghanistan to become a haven for terrorists. It’s my hope that we can bring our troops home safely as soon as possible, but we should bring them home in victory, not defeat.
I’m opposed to trying terrorists in civilian court and I disagree with Attorney General Holder’s decision to try 9/11 terrorist mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed in a civilian court rather than in a military tribunal. A military tribunal trial will better protect sensitive national security information.
Comments
“Senator” Blumenthal appears to cover more ground in his foreign policy and national security issues than “Senator” McMahon. There is agreement in bringing troops home but McMahon leaves the start of that process undefined while Blumenthal supports the current administration strategy.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Blumenthal & McMahon – The Issues – Part III – Education
This is the third in a series of postings on the policy proposal of the two major Senatorial candidates, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and former WWE Executive Linda McMahon.
The third topic is Education. Since “Senator” Blumenthal was first last time, “Senator” McMahonl leads off this third part of the series.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
“I support competition and choice through charter schools.”
I believe that every child should have an opportunity for the best education we can provide. We have to continue to provide education that will close the achievement gap for lower income students.
I am a strong supporter of the secondary school reform, which is underway in Connecticut. We must require high standards and accountability for teachers and school administrators, and I support the current review of the teacher evaluation process that the State Board is undertaking.
I believe in local control.
I am an advocate for choice through charter schools.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
It is vital that all students have the opportunity to attend a great school, and as your U.S. Senator, I will work to ensure they can. Across the nation, states and the federal government are working in good faith to find a way to achieve this long-sought goal. As your U.S. Senator, I will join this fight, working to reform education, improve student achievement, and train, recruit, and reward the best and brightest teachers.
Reforming No Child Left Behind. We need to reform the No Child Left Behind (“NCLB”) Act so that we close student achievement gaps and improve student performance… I will fight for a law that recognizes that standardized tests should be only one tool in a comprehensive set of tools for measuring student progress.
Full Funding for Federal Education Programs. We must ensure that the federal government adheres to its promise to fully fund elementary and secondary education. In the Senate, I will fight for federal education laws that will finally give our teachers the resources they need – the resources they’ve been promised for so many years – to do right by their students.
Restoring the Teaching Profession. We need to restore the profession of teaching to the level of social significance that it deserves.
Improving Early Education. The foundation for a student’s success is established during a child’s early years, and we need to place significant emphasis on the involvement of parents in a student’s education. We must also improve access to early education programs such as Head Start and Jump Start.
Promoting Innovation in Elementary and Secondary Education. We need to promote innovation in education that allows students to receive the education that best meets their needs.
Ending Disparities in Performance and Access to College. At the primary and secondary school level, we need to close achievement gaps and improve dropout rates. I agree with national advocates who believe we must make high school graduation a national priority. I also support vocational training programs which provide non-college bound students with the skills to enter and compete in the workplace, but I believe that everyone should have the opportunity to go to college. We must ensure that all low-income and middle-class students who share this aspiration have the opportunity to attend a public university or community college without being saddled with debt. This is why I support a permanent college tax credit for middle-class families who would otherwise struggle with the high costs of today’s tuition.
Comments
“Senator” McMahon is short and to the point – local control, charter schools, and school choice. “Senator” Blumenthal is again more nuanced. He covers primary, secondary, and college education. He writes of support for teachers, parents, and students. His issue paper covers the waterfront. Which candidate reflects your views and deserves your support?
The third topic is Education. Since “Senator” Blumenthal was first last time, “Senator” McMahonl leads off this third part of the series.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
“I support competition and choice through charter schools.”
I believe that every child should have an opportunity for the best education we can provide. We have to continue to provide education that will close the achievement gap for lower income students.
I am a strong supporter of the secondary school reform, which is underway in Connecticut. We must require high standards and accountability for teachers and school administrators, and I support the current review of the teacher evaluation process that the State Board is undertaking.
I believe in local control.
I am an advocate for choice through charter schools.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
It is vital that all students have the opportunity to attend a great school, and as your U.S. Senator, I will work to ensure they can. Across the nation, states and the federal government are working in good faith to find a way to achieve this long-sought goal. As your U.S. Senator, I will join this fight, working to reform education, improve student achievement, and train, recruit, and reward the best and brightest teachers.
Reforming No Child Left Behind. We need to reform the No Child Left Behind (“NCLB”) Act so that we close student achievement gaps and improve student performance… I will fight for a law that recognizes that standardized tests should be only one tool in a comprehensive set of tools for measuring student progress.
Full Funding for Federal Education Programs. We must ensure that the federal government adheres to its promise to fully fund elementary and secondary education. In the Senate, I will fight for federal education laws that will finally give our teachers the resources they need – the resources they’ve been promised for so many years – to do right by their students.
Restoring the Teaching Profession. We need to restore the profession of teaching to the level of social significance that it deserves.
Improving Early Education. The foundation for a student’s success is established during a child’s early years, and we need to place significant emphasis on the involvement of parents in a student’s education. We must also improve access to early education programs such as Head Start and Jump Start.
Promoting Innovation in Elementary and Secondary Education. We need to promote innovation in education that allows students to receive the education that best meets their needs.
Ending Disparities in Performance and Access to College. At the primary and secondary school level, we need to close achievement gaps and improve dropout rates. I agree with national advocates who believe we must make high school graduation a national priority. I also support vocational training programs which provide non-college bound students with the skills to enter and compete in the workplace, but I believe that everyone should have the opportunity to go to college. We must ensure that all low-income and middle-class students who share this aspiration have the opportunity to attend a public university or community college without being saddled with debt. This is why I support a permanent college tax credit for middle-class families who would otherwise struggle with the high costs of today’s tuition.
Comments
“Senator” McMahon is short and to the point – local control, charter schools, and school choice. “Senator” Blumenthal is again more nuanced. He covers primary, secondary, and college education. He writes of support for teachers, parents, and students. His issue paper covers the waterfront. Which candidate reflects your views and deserves your support?
Blumenthal And "Stolen Valor"
Monday, September 20, 2010
Blumenthal & McMahon – The Issues – Part II – Health Care
This is the second in a series of postings on the policy proposal of the two major Senatorial candidates, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and former WWE Executive Linda McMahon.
The second topic is Health Care. Since “Senator” McMahon was first last time, “Senator” Blumenthal leads off this second part of the series.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
The recent health reform legislation is a good first step. The new law will stop many of the insurance industry’s most egregious practices, including pre-existing condition discrimination, canceling policies when someone falls ill, and using gender, age, and other discriminatory factors to charge higher premiums. However, the new law does not do enough to control the skyrocketing costs of care. Going forward, we must do more to protect consumers and ensure quality, affordable care for all Americans.
Challenging Illegal Drug Company Marketing Practices
Protecting Seniors from Fraud.
Standing Up to Big Tobacco
Fighting Public Health Threats
I will expand on these efforts in the Senate. I will continue working to ensure that our citizens have access to the highest-quality care, while also taking on the special interests blocking real change to curb our exploding costs. Here are some of the actions we must take:
Negotiating Prescription Drug Prices.
Prohibiting Drug Company Exploitation of Dual Eligibles.
Eliminating Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Public Health Insurance Programs. I know we need to rein in the con artists taking advantage of our health insurance programs.
Ending the Medicare Part D “Donut Hole”. As your U.S. Senator, I will fight to quickly put an end to the donut hole, ensuring that no Connecticut seniors are forced to go without the medicines they need.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
“Real reform must address the problem of rising costs.”
I support several common sense cost-cutting proposals.
Malpractice reform must be an essential part of health care reform.
We must allow individuals and small businesses to pool together to get health insurance at lower prices.
We must allow individuals to purchase health insurance across state lines.
I support efforts to expand coverage by improving the private market system. Every American should be able to choose the health care plan that best meets his or her needs. And the doctor-patient relationship must be protected. Government-run health care won’t do that.
Comments
Both candidates state that controlling the high costs of healthcare is a priority. After that, there is little similarity with their programs. Blumenthal’s approach is more consumer oriented and McMahon’s approach is more from the business point of view. Neither approach is surprising given the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans on this issue. The voter’s are encouraged to decide which is the best approach for their situation and vote for the candidate accordingly.
The second topic is Health Care. Since “Senator” McMahon was first last time, “Senator” Blumenthal leads off this second part of the series.
“Senator” Richard Blumenthal
The recent health reform legislation is a good first step. The new law will stop many of the insurance industry’s most egregious practices, including pre-existing condition discrimination, canceling policies when someone falls ill, and using gender, age, and other discriminatory factors to charge higher premiums. However, the new law does not do enough to control the skyrocketing costs of care. Going forward, we must do more to protect consumers and ensure quality, affordable care for all Americans.
Challenging Illegal Drug Company Marketing Practices
Protecting Seniors from Fraud.
Standing Up to Big Tobacco
Fighting Public Health Threats
I will expand on these efforts in the Senate. I will continue working to ensure that our citizens have access to the highest-quality care, while also taking on the special interests blocking real change to curb our exploding costs. Here are some of the actions we must take:
Negotiating Prescription Drug Prices.
Prohibiting Drug Company Exploitation of Dual Eligibles.
Eliminating Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Public Health Insurance Programs. I know we need to rein in the con artists taking advantage of our health insurance programs.
Ending the Medicare Part D “Donut Hole”. As your U.S. Senator, I will fight to quickly put an end to the donut hole, ensuring that no Connecticut seniors are forced to go without the medicines they need.
“Senator” Linda McMahon
“Real reform must address the problem of rising costs.”
I support several common sense cost-cutting proposals.
Malpractice reform must be an essential part of health care reform.
We must allow individuals and small businesses to pool together to get health insurance at lower prices.
We must allow individuals to purchase health insurance across state lines.
I support efforts to expand coverage by improving the private market system. Every American should be able to choose the health care plan that best meets his or her needs. And the doctor-patient relationship must be protected. Government-run health care won’t do that.
Comments
Both candidates state that controlling the high costs of healthcare is a priority. After that, there is little similarity with their programs. Blumenthal’s approach is more consumer oriented and McMahon’s approach is more from the business point of view. Neither approach is surprising given the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans on this issue. The voter’s are encouraged to decide which is the best approach for their situation and vote for the candidate accordingly.
Friday, September 17, 2010
Eastern Connecticut Candidates Face Realtors
Thursday morning, September 16,2010, the Eastern Connecticut Association of Realtors (ECAR)hosted a Candidate breakfast in Norwich for State House and Senate candidates. Twenty three incumbents and hopefuls showed up to address the large number of realtors and Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut members. The meeting was well covered in the New London DAY and the Norwich BULLETIN.
Prior to introducing the candidates, ECAR President Debra Chamberlain referred to the FIVE BUDGET PRINCPLES FOR ELIMINATING DEFICITS that were on the screen behind the podium and in the meeting packet provided to all who attended. Since the candidates referred to these principles during their two and one half minute presentations I will repeat them below
Senatorial Candidates
18th District - Stuart Norman (R) - Agree with the five principles.
Senator Andrew Maynard (D) - Opposed the conveyance tax. This is the worst budget crisis ever and there will be pressure to look for other revenue sources. Did not vote for last year's budget. This year will see a 20% revenue reduction. There will be some cuts, some new revenue, and some borrowing to balance the budget.
19th District - Sean Sullivan (R) - Agree with the five principles. Need to focus on who can "right the ship". People currently in office did not take appropriate actions to change course. In the Navy, if you run aground, you are fired (Sullivan is a retired Navy Captain, currently a practicing lawyer in Norwich). The current incumbents are nice people, but they have not done the job and should be fired.
Senaor Edith Prague (D) - We are in a crisis. We need to make changes without hurting other human beings. We cannot keep doing it the same way. Departments like the Department of Corrections and the Department of Environmental Protection must operate more efficiently. There will be savings in the large departments and a number of deputy commissioners that could be eliminated. It is not business as usual. However need to keep services for the elderly, children, and other disadvantaged citizens.
20th District - Senator Andrea Stillman (D) - The five principles make sense. Weneed to reduce spendng but the real question is where and how to do it responsibly and keep in mind the people that cannot help themselves..Hopes that everyone understands that most state bonding is for school construction where the state pays eighty percent and the municipality pays twenty percent. The state will also have to look for new revenue sources. The greatest task is creating jobs in a green economy.
35th District- Senator Tony Guglielmo(R) - He quoted the prime minister of Belgium who stated "We know what to do, we just don't know how to get reelected after we do it." In the past we used surpluses to start new programs rather than pay down debt. The State cannot afford all the programs currently in place. It is time to pay the piper.
House Districts
37th District (East Lyme/Salem) - Holly Cheeseman (R) - We have a legislature that looks at the golden eggs and has forgotten about tending to the goose. We need lower spending and more accountability. We must use best practices and results based accountability.
-Rep Ed Jutila (D) - Priorities are jobs, the economy, and getting the fiscal house in order. Will use results based accountability to determ stat of programs. However, in the past, did not get the cooperation from the Executive Branch. It is not possible without reliable data. State bonding should focus on creating jobs, improving infrastructure, and schools.
38th District (Waterford/Montville) - Tony Siragusa (R) - Cut spending as first priority. No tax increases. Democrats have accomplished very litte. They could cut spending if they really wanted to do so.
- Rep. Eizabeth (Betsy) Ritter (D) - (Rep Ritter arrived late due to a prior dental appointment and was the last candidate to speak but I have included her with her district ) - Worked on state Health Insurance but the task is not complete and am looking forward to finishing the job. Busines in the state, town and region need economic vitality and security to compete in the global markets.
39th District (New London) - Andrew Lockwood (R) - Hartford is out of control. Legislature is not listening to the people. No more spending and no tax increases. Most state jobs could be given to the private sector.
41st District - Elissa Wright (D) (Groton) - She is fully aware of role of housing in the economic recovery. Serves on the Banking Committee. The State needs jobs to grow to support the housing market. Believes that the legislature has been following the five principles. 22% of authorized bonding was cancelled in the last session.
42nd District (Preston, Ledyard, Montville)- John Rodolico (R) If next year's legislature looks like the current legislature, don't be surprised if nothing gets done. State needs to reorganized, privatize, and have fiscal discipline.
Rep Tom Reynolds (D) - Five principles good for the short term but not for the long term. Both branches of government share reponsibility for problems. New administration needs to perform some long range planning, plan for pension and debt, provide a comprehensive tax strategy.
44th District (Killingly/Plainfield/Sterling) - Michael Struzik (R) - Solving problems with the budget does not seem to be a priority with current majority.
Rep. Mae Flexer (D) - Legislature needs appropriate suggestions of specific progrms to cut.
45th District (Griswold, Lisbon, Plainfield, Voluntown) - Michale Zelasky (R) - thenumber one issue is jobs. The best tool to create jobs is a tax cut. Need to elect people who will do the job. Need tax cuts - not new revenue streams, not borrowing, just cuts and it will be painful.
Rep. Steve Mikutel (D) - Don't paint all of the legislature with the same broad brush. Voted against the budget because it was not honest. State needs to put its fiscal house in order. Will continue to make the tough choices.
46th District (Norwich) Rep Melissa Olson (D) - Appreciate the five principles but need to have input on what should be cut. What are citizens willing to give up? CONNPACE, ECS Funding, Closing more DMV offices? Legislature needs to know what we are willing to give up?
47th District (Canterbury, NOrwich, Scotland, and Sprague)-Rep Chris Coutu (R) - Proud of the no vote on the conveyance tax. There is a $5 billion deficit ($3.4 billion in general fund budget and over $1 billion in unfunded retirement benefits) Connecticut is bankrupt. The choice is decrease spending or increase taxes.
Catherine Osten (D) - Know how to lower taxes and balance a budget. Even took a pay cut as First Selectman of Sprague to help balance that budget. From record will see that knows how to make the tough decisions.
51st District (Killingly, Putnam, and Thompson) - Daniel Rovero (D) - Look at record as Mayor for 14 years. Town has lowest tax rate and no bonding. Will not mortgage future. Need to make tough decisions in Hartford.
Comment
Generally the incumbent points with pride and the challenger views with alarm during an election cycle. This year both are "viewing with alarm". The incumbents are saying that it will be different next year and they will tackle the problems. The challengers are saying that the incumbents had their chance and it is time for new persons with different agenda to solve the problems. Unfortunately, there was no time for questions during this meeting. The voters will make their choice on a district by district basis on November 2.
Prior to introducing the candidates, ECAR President Debra Chamberlain referred to the FIVE BUDGET PRINCPLES FOR ELIMINATING DEFICITS that were on the screen behind the podium and in the meeting packet provided to all who attended. Since the candidates referred to these principles during their two and one half minute presentations I will repeat them below
1. Reduce Spending first.
2. In making cuts, all stakeholders must share the pain to the extent that it is economically and socially responsible.
3. Restrain bonding, recognizing per capita debt is extremely hight and interest payments consume a large share of State spending.
4. Use a broad-based approach in selecting new or expanded revenue sources, but only after reducing spending to the level for most efficient performance of core government functions. REALTORS accepted a temporary increase in out license fees as part of an overall adjustment in all occupational fees.
5. There should be no added taxation on the real estate transaction,k particularly when the Federal government is relying on the housing sector to lead an economic recovery with measures like the first-time buyer's tax credit.
Senatorial Candidates
18th District - Stuart Norman (R) - Agree with the five principles.
Senator Andrew Maynard (D) - Opposed the conveyance tax. This is the worst budget crisis ever and there will be pressure to look for other revenue sources. Did not vote for last year's budget. This year will see a 20% revenue reduction. There will be some cuts, some new revenue, and some borrowing to balance the budget.
19th District - Sean Sullivan (R) - Agree with the five principles. Need to focus on who can "right the ship". People currently in office did not take appropriate actions to change course. In the Navy, if you run aground, you are fired (Sullivan is a retired Navy Captain, currently a practicing lawyer in Norwich). The current incumbents are nice people, but they have not done the job and should be fired.
Senaor Edith Prague (D) - We are in a crisis. We need to make changes without hurting other human beings. We cannot keep doing it the same way. Departments like the Department of Corrections and the Department of Environmental Protection must operate more efficiently. There will be savings in the large departments and a number of deputy commissioners that could be eliminated. It is not business as usual. However need to keep services for the elderly, children, and other disadvantaged citizens.
20th District - Senator Andrea Stillman (D) - The five principles make sense. Weneed to reduce spendng but the real question is where and how to do it responsibly and keep in mind the people that cannot help themselves..Hopes that everyone understands that most state bonding is for school construction where the state pays eighty percent and the municipality pays twenty percent. The state will also have to look for new revenue sources. The greatest task is creating jobs in a green economy.
35th District- Senator Tony Guglielmo(R) - He quoted the prime minister of Belgium who stated "We know what to do, we just don't know how to get reelected after we do it." In the past we used surpluses to start new programs rather than pay down debt. The State cannot afford all the programs currently in place. It is time to pay the piper.
House Districts
37th District (East Lyme/Salem) - Holly Cheeseman (R) - We have a legislature that looks at the golden eggs and has forgotten about tending to the goose. We need lower spending and more accountability. We must use best practices and results based accountability.
-Rep Ed Jutila (D) - Priorities are jobs, the economy, and getting the fiscal house in order. Will use results based accountability to determ stat of programs. However, in the past, did not get the cooperation from the Executive Branch. It is not possible without reliable data. State bonding should focus on creating jobs, improving infrastructure, and schools.
38th District (Waterford/Montville) - Tony Siragusa (R) - Cut spending as first priority. No tax increases. Democrats have accomplished very litte. They could cut spending if they really wanted to do so.
- Rep. Eizabeth (Betsy) Ritter (D) - (Rep Ritter arrived late due to a prior dental appointment and was the last candidate to speak but I have included her with her district ) - Worked on state Health Insurance but the task is not complete and am looking forward to finishing the job. Busines in the state, town and region need economic vitality and security to compete in the global markets.
39th District (New London) - Andrew Lockwood (R) - Hartford is out of control. Legislature is not listening to the people. No more spending and no tax increases. Most state jobs could be given to the private sector.
41st District - Elissa Wright (D) (Groton) - She is fully aware of role of housing in the economic recovery. Serves on the Banking Committee. The State needs jobs to grow to support the housing market. Believes that the legislature has been following the five principles. 22% of authorized bonding was cancelled in the last session.
42nd District (Preston, Ledyard, Montville)- John Rodolico (R) If next year's legislature looks like the current legislature, don't be surprised if nothing gets done. State needs to reorganized, privatize, and have fiscal discipline.
Rep Tom Reynolds (D) - Five principles good for the short term but not for the long term. Both branches of government share reponsibility for problems. New administration needs to perform some long range planning, plan for pension and debt, provide a comprehensive tax strategy.
44th District (Killingly/Plainfield/Sterling) - Michael Struzik (R) - Solving problems with the budget does not seem to be a priority with current majority.
Rep. Mae Flexer (D) - Legislature needs appropriate suggestions of specific progrms to cut.
45th District (Griswold, Lisbon, Plainfield, Voluntown) - Michale Zelasky (R) - thenumber one issue is jobs. The best tool to create jobs is a tax cut. Need to elect people who will do the job. Need tax cuts - not new revenue streams, not borrowing, just cuts and it will be painful.
Rep. Steve Mikutel (D) - Don't paint all of the legislature with the same broad brush. Voted against the budget because it was not honest. State needs to put its fiscal house in order. Will continue to make the tough choices.
46th District (Norwich) Rep Melissa Olson (D) - Appreciate the five principles but need to have input on what should be cut. What are citizens willing to give up? CONNPACE, ECS Funding, Closing more DMV offices? Legislature needs to know what we are willing to give up?
47th District (Canterbury, NOrwich, Scotland, and Sprague)-Rep Chris Coutu (R) - Proud of the no vote on the conveyance tax. There is a $5 billion deficit ($3.4 billion in general fund budget and over $1 billion in unfunded retirement benefits) Connecticut is bankrupt. The choice is decrease spending or increase taxes.
Catherine Osten (D) - Know how to lower taxes and balance a budget. Even took a pay cut as First Selectman of Sprague to help balance that budget. From record will see that knows how to make the tough decisions.
51st District (Killingly, Putnam, and Thompson) - Daniel Rovero (D) - Look at record as Mayor for 14 years. Town has lowest tax rate and no bonding. Will not mortgage future. Need to make tough decisions in Hartford.
Comment
Generally the incumbent points with pride and the challenger views with alarm during an election cycle. This year both are "viewing with alarm". The incumbents are saying that it will be different next year and they will tackle the problems. The challengers are saying that the incumbents had their chance and it is time for new persons with different agenda to solve the problems. Unfortunately, there was no time for questions during this meeting. The voters will make their choice on a district by district basis on November 2.
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Larson, Do You Know Where Your Congressman Is?
The old U.S.
Larson is heir to this tradition. He also is something of a partisan pit bull, not that there’s anything wrong with that. Dodd believes a senator can compromise without compromising himself but acknowledges that fruitful compromise is less likely in the more raucous House.
Only a few months ago, Dodd, Larson and their confreres in the congress spurned the sort of compromise Dodd praised during his exit interview, passing two complex and expensive bills, largely unread, heartily opposed for reasons of principle by the loyal opposition. The Democrats in the congress were able to pass a massive health care bill and an equally massive economic regulations bill because they had the votes, Dodd and Larson leading the charge in the Senate and House, and a righteous wind named President Barrack Obama at their back. Heedless of the warning “be careful what you wish for,” Democrats got what they wished for, and they shall have to live with the consequence of these bills – together, an absurd effort to make the world over – throughout the coming election campaign.
Larson has been loud in his approval of the Democrats’ uncompromising legislative sausage links, but polls taken several weeks before the election have marred the brows of some Democrats with worry lines. President Obama’s poll ratings are but a shadow of what they were when he was perceived in his campaign for the presidency as tolerably moderate. Recent polls show a precipitous decline in his popularity, and some commentators, a bit slow on the uptake, now are beginning to entertain the thought that his precipitous decline may have something or other to do with those expensive entrepreneurial killing bills, the fervent partisanship of Democrats, and the Democratic controlled congress, so un-Dodd like in its indisposition to forge cross-party coalitions. The righteous wind, it would seem, has had some wind kicked out of it.
Disputes about the economy this election season likely will center upon the flow of money between states and the federal government, a dispute as old as the republic itself. Some conservatives, unable to shed the view of virtually all the founders, still cling to antique notions expressed most persuasively by Bill Buckley, who thought that “stimulus” funds, tax dollars used to boost the economy, are best kept in the hands of productive entrepreneurs, who are perfectly able to stimulate business activity without – thank you very much – yielding abjectly to the demands made upon them by ear-markers in Washington such as the late Rep. John Murtha, a pustule of corruption famous for shuttling tax dollars to his political patrons.
It was pointless, Buckley insisted, for taxpayers in Connecticut to send to Washington a tax dollar while receiving back from the horn of plenty sixty nine cents on the dollar. The sixty nine cents meant that Connecticut Pennsylvania Maine Connecticut Washington
Murtha, once cited as a co-conspirator in the infamous ABSCAM sting, was a political shakedown artist of great accomplishment, but those, like Larson in Connecticut Washington Connecticut Washington
However, there’s no harm in asking. When tax rich Obama, showed up in Stamford on the 16th, there were hosts of Democrats in attendance, begging bowls in hand, crying out, like some poor wretched Oliver Twist, “Please sir, I want some more.”
Republicans steered clear, as did Rep. Jim Hines, who is trying to put some ideological distance between himself and the once popular president. And Connecticut
Foley Flunks
Ω
CT News Junkie reports:
Funding Schools Based on Performance Is Part of His Plan
Tom Foley:
This is utter nonsense - give more money to the schools that are doing the best - well-financed suburban schools - and deprive schools with the greatest needs - poorly financed inner cities schools funded by inadequate tax bases and facing overwhelming socio-economic disadvantages?
To what end? Students cannot easily transfer to schools in different communities, or even in the same community but further from home. Even if geography, transportation issues, and political boundaries where not a problem, it's not like better performing schools have unlimited capacity - most, if not all, are already full. A "market based approach to education" assumes there is flexibility in supply and demand when in fact there is almost none.
This is the most absurd policy position I have ever heard from a mainstream candidate.
CT News Junkie reports:
Funding Schools Based on Performance Is Part of His Plan
Tom Foley:
"(M)oney should go to the schools that are performing and resources should be diverted from the schools that are underperforming."
This is utter nonsense - give more money to the schools that are doing the best - well-financed suburban schools - and deprive schools with the greatest needs - poorly financed inner cities schools funded by inadequate tax bases and facing overwhelming socio-economic disadvantages?
To what end? Students cannot easily transfer to schools in different communities, or even in the same community but further from home. Even if geography, transportation issues, and political boundaries where not a problem, it's not like better performing schools have unlimited capacity - most, if not all, are already full. A "market based approach to education" assumes there is flexibility in supply and demand when in fact there is almost none.
This is the most absurd policy position I have ever heard from a mainstream candidate.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Blumenthal & McMahon – The Issues – Part I – The Economy & Jobs
A few weeks ago I did a series of postings on the policy and issue statements of the Republican and Democratic Candidates for Governor of Connecticut. Now it is time to focus on the two major Senatorial candidates, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and former WWE Executive Linda McMahon.
It is not surprising that the first topic in both on line issue pages is Jobs and the Economy. I did a mental coin flip and “Senator” McMahon won and elected to go first. As before, the "I" in the plans are either "Senator" McMahon or "Senator" Blumenthal. The wording is directly from the issues section on their web sites.
Linda McMahon
Economic Growth and Job Creation
Framework For Creating Jobs
1. Prevent Tax Increases
Stop Anti-Growth Tax Policies.
Prevent scheduled income tax rate increases and move to reducing the corporate tax rate.
Stop the capital gains tax rate from going up.
Stop the dividend tax rate from going up.
Allow full same-year deductions for capital losses
Abolish both the estate tax and the gift tax.
Repeal the limits on tax-deferred retirement account contributions.
Allow greater deductions for educational expenses
Restore and make permanent the Research and Development tax credit to promote innovation
Create A Business Friendly Tax Policy
Allow businesses to deduct 100% of the cost of any capital expenses for equipment, technology, software, or buildings from their taxable income in the year they buy the asset.
Eliminate the employer portion of the payroll tax for one year
2. Reduce Regulations
Eliminate Anti-Growth Legislation and Policies
Reduce burdensome regulations and mandates on businesses.
Stop Cap-and-Trade legislation, which could be the most antigrowth legislation of all.
Stop Card check legislation.
Resist protectionist policies that hamper global trade and investment
Increase energy supplies
Increase nuclear power
Increase domestic energy exploration
Increase Alaska drilling and production
Increase oil exploration elsewhere within our own borders, e.g. the Green River formation and the Bakken Shale deposit
End the Use of “Policy Czars” to Evade Congressional Oversight
Stop proliferation of Executive Orders in place of legislation.
Restore the constitutionally determined balance of power.
Richard Blumenthal
Jobs & Economy
Here are some of the things I believe we must do:
I support extending the Bush tax cuts for the 95% of Americans making under a quarter of a million dollars a year.
Small Businesses
Innovation. We must promote technological innovation
R&D Tax Credit: It should not just be extended, it should be made permanent.
Small Business Innovation Research: The Small Business Innovation Research (“SBIR”) program helps small, high-tech businesses in their early stages, and has a proven track record of creating new jobs. I support making it permanent and expanding its funding.
Entrepreneurship. We must encourage entrepreneurs to create new companies, and increase the opportunities for these companies to succeed.
Start-up Deduction. We can start by upgrading the tax deduction for start-ups
Elimination of Capital Gains on Certain Small Business Stock. We should also make sure tax policy helps to nurture long-term small business growth by eliminating capital gains taxes on investments in small business stock – if that stock is held for at least five years.
Loans. We must do more to help small businesses maintain access to the credit they need to sustain and expand their companies.
Direct Lending. A direct lending program through the SBA, without red tape, operating as a backup to the private structure, will ensure that healthy small businesses can access funds even during a credit crunch.
Commercial Credit Card Reform Last year, Congress passed landmark reforms to protect credit card consumers from unjustified rate increases and other fraudulent practices. These protections should be extended to apply fully to small businesses which depend on credit cards to get through tough times.
Tax Cuts to Promote Hiring. I support the new temporary payroll tax holiday for companies hiring new workers, and I think this holiday should be extended.
Exports. The federal government has an obligation to assist small businesses in their efforts to sell their products abroad. Small businesses don't have the time or resources to match their products with potential purchasers across places like Europe and Asia. We must expand programs helping them promote their goods overseas, and work to improve access to overseas markets for small domestic companies. In Washington,
Made in Connecticut
Protecting “Made in the USA
Standing Up for Connecticut Companies
Standing Up for Connecticut Workers
Made in America I will continue to help make sure Connecticut’s manufacturers have the financial support and the level playing field necessary to help drive economic growth across our state. Some of my ideas include:
Ending Tax Breaks for Shipping Jobs Overseas.
Promoting American Products for our Economic Recovery.
I support shoring up the stimulus’s “Buy American” requirements, and updating federal contracting rules by passing the 21st Century Buy American Act, to ensure that our tax dollars do not create jobs in China before creating them here.
Combating Chinese Currency Manipulation
Creating Partnerships for Workforce Training I support the SECTORS Act, a national grant program that will fund local partnerships among business, labor, and education providers to ensure Connecticut workers build the skills they need to succeed in new industries.
Building Green Manufacturing.
Promoting Investments in Clean Energy Technology I support increasing our investment in clean-energy technologies, which will help create as many as 2.5 million new jobs, boost the economy, and improve the environment
Investing in Domestic Clean Energy Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability. I strongly support proposals like the Investments for Manufacturing Progress and Clean Technology ("IMPACT") Act. The act would help small and medium sized local manufacturers by providing loans to improve their facilities and expand clean energy product production.
Extending and Expanding the Manufacturing Tax Credit. I strongly support extending the Manufacturing Tax Credit, which promotes advanced energy manufacturing, another two years and expanding it to meet demand.
Increasing the R&D Tax Credit and Making it Permanent.
Creating Incentives for Residential Efficiency Retrofitting. I support the Home Star Energy Retrofit Act (or "Cash for Caulkers") program which will combine financial incentives and uniform federal energy efficiency standards to dramatically extend efforts to improve residential energy efficiency.
Holding Wall Street Accountable Washington finally passed a comprehensive reform of the financial system, which I support. We must build on these solutions to ensure that the American people are protected from future recklessness
To Protect Homeowners
Fighting Predatory Lending.
Holding Countrywide Accountable
Responding to the Crisis
Opposing the Big Wall Street Bailout.
Opposing Bailout Bonuses
Reforming the Financial System. I support the recent financial reform legislation, which implements many of the structural changes that should have been a part of the Wall Street bailout two years ago. And I believe we must go further to protect you, the taxpayer, and to make sure that we safeguard our financial system:
Strengthening the Consumer Financial Protection Agency I will fight to strengthen this agency and to make sure it has the independence necessary to defend consumers.
Reforming the Credit Rating Agencies. The three major credit rating agencies were unbelievably irresponsible in the buildup to the financial crisis, issuing top ratings to bonds for which they could not actually identify risk. Now, we must do more to ensure that these companies are fulfilling the rating function on which our financial system depends.
Growing the Green Energy Industry As your U.S. Senator I will fight to ensure that the United States leads in the global green energy marketplace. Some of the actions I propose include:
TAX CREDITS
Extending and Expanding the Manufacturing Tax Credit. I strongly support extending the Manufacturing Tax Credit,
Increasing the R&D Tax Credit and Making it Permanent
Providing Utility Tax Credits Providing a tax credit for utilities to construct plants that use both natural gas and renewable energy will help utilities pay for facilities that use renewable energy with natural gas backup.
IMPROVING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Creating Incentives for Residential Efficiency Retrofitting. I support the Home Star Energy Retrofit Act (or "Cash for Caulkers") program which will combine financial incentives and uniform federal energy efficiency standards to dramatically extend efforts to improve residential energy efficiency.
Establishing Cash for Commercial Clunkers. Old, inefficient “heavy-load vehicles” are major gas guzzlers and polluters. I believe we should establish a program that would pay up to $65,000 per vehicle to get old diesel trucks off the road and replace them with natural gas and alternative fuel vehicles while spurring job-creating demand for vehicles and fueling stations.
Curbing Pollution. As your U.S. Senator, I will listen to ideas from anyone, regardless of party, on how to bring the financial costs, environmental destruction and adverse health consequences caused by polluters under control.
INVESTMENTS IN INDUSTRY
Promoting Clean Energy Technology. I support increasing our investment in clean-energy technologies, which will help create as many as 2.5 million new jobs, boost the economy, and improve the environment.
Investing in Domestic Clean Energy Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability. I strongly support proposals like the Investments for Manufacturing Progress and Clean Technology ("IMPACT") Act. The act would help small and medium sized local manufacturers by providing loans to improve their facilities and expand clean energy product production
• Establish Clean Energy Business Zones. Establishing Clean Energy Business Zones (CBiZ) will help our businesses and manufacturers transition from fossil fuels to clean energy. Businesses in newly established Clean Energy Business Zones would receive up to $1.2 billion per year in tax credits, grants and loan guarantees for companies in the clean energy sector or for companies that move to greater energy efficiency.
Comments
“Senator” McMahon has a simple plan to promote jobs and the economy – Cut Taxes, Cut Regulations, and don’t do anything to hinder the free market.
“Senator” Blumenthal’s plan is much more nuanced. He mixes some tax breaks with some regulations and a pitch for consumer protection and safe environment.
It is up to the voter to decide which program they feel is best for the Junior Senator from Connecticut.
It is not surprising that the first topic in both on line issue pages is Jobs and the Economy. I did a mental coin flip and “Senator” McMahon won and elected to go first. As before, the "I" in the plans are either "Senator" McMahon or "Senator" Blumenthal. The wording is directly from the issues section on their web sites.
Linda McMahon
Economic Growth and Job Creation
Framework For Creating Jobs
1. Prevent Tax Increases
Stop Anti-Growth Tax Policies.
Prevent scheduled income tax rate increases and move to reducing the corporate tax rate.
Stop the capital gains tax rate from going up.
Stop the dividend tax rate from going up.
Allow full same-year deductions for capital losses
Abolish both the estate tax and the gift tax.
Repeal the limits on tax-deferred retirement account contributions.
Allow greater deductions for educational expenses
Restore and make permanent the Research and Development tax credit to promote innovation
Create A Business Friendly Tax Policy
Allow businesses to deduct 100% of the cost of any capital expenses for equipment, technology, software, or buildings from their taxable income in the year they buy the asset.
Eliminate the employer portion of the payroll tax for one year
2. Reduce Regulations
Eliminate Anti-Growth Legislation and Policies
Reduce burdensome regulations and mandates on businesses.
Stop Cap-and-Trade legislation, which could be the most antigrowth legislation of all.
Stop Card check legislation.
Resist protectionist policies that hamper global trade and investment
Increase energy supplies
Increase nuclear power
Increase domestic energy exploration
Increase Alaska drilling and production
Increase oil exploration elsewhere within our own borders, e.g. the Green River formation and the Bakken Shale deposit
End the Use of “Policy Czars” to Evade Congressional Oversight
Stop proliferation of Executive Orders in place of legislation.
Restore the constitutionally determined balance of power.
Richard Blumenthal
Jobs & Economy
Here are some of the things I believe we must do:
I support extending the Bush tax cuts for the 95% of Americans making under a quarter of a million dollars a year.
Small Businesses
Innovation. We must promote technological innovation
R&D Tax Credit: It should not just be extended, it should be made permanent.
Small Business Innovation Research: The Small Business Innovation Research (“SBIR”) program helps small, high-tech businesses in their early stages, and has a proven track record of creating new jobs. I support making it permanent and expanding its funding.
Entrepreneurship. We must encourage entrepreneurs to create new companies, and increase the opportunities for these companies to succeed.
Start-up Deduction. We can start by upgrading the tax deduction for start-ups
Elimination of Capital Gains on Certain Small Business Stock. We should also make sure tax policy helps to nurture long-term small business growth by eliminating capital gains taxes on investments in small business stock – if that stock is held for at least five years.
Loans. We must do more to help small businesses maintain access to the credit they need to sustain and expand their companies.
Direct Lending. A direct lending program through the SBA, without red tape, operating as a backup to the private structure, will ensure that healthy small businesses can access funds even during a credit crunch.
Commercial Credit Card Reform Last year, Congress passed landmark reforms to protect credit card consumers from unjustified rate increases and other fraudulent practices. These protections should be extended to apply fully to small businesses which depend on credit cards to get through tough times.
Tax Cuts to Promote Hiring. I support the new temporary payroll tax holiday for companies hiring new workers, and I think this holiday should be extended.
Exports. The federal government has an obligation to assist small businesses in their efforts to sell their products abroad. Small businesses don't have the time or resources to match their products with potential purchasers across places like Europe and Asia. We must expand programs helping them promote their goods overseas, and work to improve access to overseas markets for small domestic companies. In Washington,
Made in Connecticut
Protecting “Made in the USA
Standing Up for Connecticut Companies
Standing Up for Connecticut Workers
Made in America I will continue to help make sure Connecticut’s manufacturers have the financial support and the level playing field necessary to help drive economic growth across our state. Some of my ideas include:
Ending Tax Breaks for Shipping Jobs Overseas.
Promoting American Products for our Economic Recovery.
I support shoring up the stimulus’s “Buy American” requirements, and updating federal contracting rules by passing the 21st Century Buy American Act, to ensure that our tax dollars do not create jobs in China before creating them here.
Combating Chinese Currency Manipulation
Creating Partnerships for Workforce Training I support the SECTORS Act, a national grant program that will fund local partnerships among business, labor, and education providers to ensure Connecticut workers build the skills they need to succeed in new industries.
Building Green Manufacturing.
Promoting Investments in Clean Energy Technology I support increasing our investment in clean-energy technologies, which will help create as many as 2.5 million new jobs, boost the economy, and improve the environment
Investing in Domestic Clean Energy Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability. I strongly support proposals like the Investments for Manufacturing Progress and Clean Technology ("IMPACT") Act. The act would help small and medium sized local manufacturers by providing loans to improve their facilities and expand clean energy product production.
Extending and Expanding the Manufacturing Tax Credit. I strongly support extending the Manufacturing Tax Credit, which promotes advanced energy manufacturing, another two years and expanding it to meet demand.
Increasing the R&D Tax Credit and Making it Permanent.
Creating Incentives for Residential Efficiency Retrofitting. I support the Home Star Energy Retrofit Act (or "Cash for Caulkers") program which will combine financial incentives and uniform federal energy efficiency standards to dramatically extend efforts to improve residential energy efficiency.
Holding Wall Street Accountable Washington finally passed a comprehensive reform of the financial system, which I support. We must build on these solutions to ensure that the American people are protected from future recklessness
To Protect Homeowners
Fighting Predatory Lending.
Holding Countrywide Accountable
Responding to the Crisis
Opposing the Big Wall Street Bailout.
Opposing Bailout Bonuses
Reforming the Financial System. I support the recent financial reform legislation, which implements many of the structural changes that should have been a part of the Wall Street bailout two years ago. And I believe we must go further to protect you, the taxpayer, and to make sure that we safeguard our financial system:
Strengthening the Consumer Financial Protection Agency I will fight to strengthen this agency and to make sure it has the independence necessary to defend consumers.
Reforming the Credit Rating Agencies. The three major credit rating agencies were unbelievably irresponsible in the buildup to the financial crisis, issuing top ratings to bonds for which they could not actually identify risk. Now, we must do more to ensure that these companies are fulfilling the rating function on which our financial system depends.
Growing the Green Energy Industry As your U.S. Senator I will fight to ensure that the United States leads in the global green energy marketplace. Some of the actions I propose include:
TAX CREDITS
Extending and Expanding the Manufacturing Tax Credit. I strongly support extending the Manufacturing Tax Credit,
Increasing the R&D Tax Credit and Making it Permanent
Providing Utility Tax Credits Providing a tax credit for utilities to construct plants that use both natural gas and renewable energy will help utilities pay for facilities that use renewable energy with natural gas backup.
IMPROVING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Creating Incentives for Residential Efficiency Retrofitting. I support the Home Star Energy Retrofit Act (or "Cash for Caulkers") program which will combine financial incentives and uniform federal energy efficiency standards to dramatically extend efforts to improve residential energy efficiency.
Establishing Cash for Commercial Clunkers. Old, inefficient “heavy-load vehicles” are major gas guzzlers and polluters. I believe we should establish a program that would pay up to $65,000 per vehicle to get old diesel trucks off the road and replace them with natural gas and alternative fuel vehicles while spurring job-creating demand for vehicles and fueling stations.
Curbing Pollution. As your U.S. Senator, I will listen to ideas from anyone, regardless of party, on how to bring the financial costs, environmental destruction and adverse health consequences caused by polluters under control.
INVESTMENTS IN INDUSTRY
Promoting Clean Energy Technology. I support increasing our investment in clean-energy technologies, which will help create as many as 2.5 million new jobs, boost the economy, and improve the environment.
Investing in Domestic Clean Energy Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability. I strongly support proposals like the Investments for Manufacturing Progress and Clean Technology ("IMPACT") Act. The act would help small and medium sized local manufacturers by providing loans to improve their facilities and expand clean energy product production
• Establish Clean Energy Business Zones. Establishing Clean Energy Business Zones (CBiZ) will help our businesses and manufacturers transition from fossil fuels to clean energy. Businesses in newly established Clean Energy Business Zones would receive up to $1.2 billion per year in tax credits, grants and loan guarantees for companies in the clean energy sector or for companies that move to greater energy efficiency.
Comments
“Senator” McMahon has a simple plan to promote jobs and the economy – Cut Taxes, Cut Regulations, and don’t do anything to hinder the free market.
“Senator” Blumenthal’s plan is much more nuanced. He mixes some tax breaks with some regulations and a pitch for consumer protection and safe environment.
It is up to the voter to decide which program they feel is best for the Junior Senator from Connecticut.
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
The New Nobility
In the Early American Republic of blessed memory, such eminences as George Washington declined titles, much in use in England at the time. The moderns, as Zach Janowski demonstrates in “Raising Hale,” have no such compunctions. In the 36-member Senate, there are 36 titled officials. In the more modest House, “only two out of three members gets a fancy title” – and an extra stipend to boot. The House listing by dollar is here, and the Senate listing here.
Mr. Janowski unwittingly has presented a strong argument for a unicameral legislature. Such an organ of popular representation would be less titled, more broadly representative and more responsible to the sort of people Washington thought were virtuous, economical and modest.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Center for Internet and Society Questions the Attack on Craigslist by Attorneys General
Attorney General Richard Blumenthal announced at a press conference today, Sept 7, that he was seeking to make sure the owner of Craigslist was not pulling his leg.
A Saturday screen shot showing the opening page of Craigslist's website for Hartford features a "censored" logo over what used to be the adult services section.
“Craigslist,” the San Francisco Chronicle reported, “apparently closed the section two weeks after 17 state attorneys general demanded it be shut down. Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, one of the AGs who pressed for the change, said in a written statement that he welcomed the change and was trying to verify Craigslist's official policy going forward.”
Ryan Calo, associated with the Center for Internet and Society and the Stanford Law School, has questioned Mr. Blumenthal’s participation in the Craigslist affair:
Matt Zimmerman, senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, agrees:
Others, including Mr. Blumenthal, worry that dissolving the adult services site will have the unfortunate effect of spreading the ads to other parts of Craigslist that will make monitoring less possible.
Mr. Blumenthal is famous for having said that his selective prosecution of companies “levels the playing field” for honest companies.
Some commentators have questioned why Mr. Blumenthal has not applied to Connecticut media outlets the same strictures he has urged Craigslist to adopt.
Hartford Courant reporter Daniela Altimari put this question to Mr. Blumenthal, drawing from the attorney general the following extenuating circumstances: 1) Although the Hartford Advocate chain of newspapers, which carries similar ads, is Connecticut based, craigslist is larger and “reaches more people.” Mr. Blumenthal has not said that the craigslist ads affect more customers living within Connecticut, the attorney general’s jurisdiction; 2) Some of the craigslist ads are more explicit than those in the Advocate chain of newspapers, the attorney general avers. In a previous blog, the following – very unsubtle – link to the Advocate ads was provided.
Mr. Blumenthal is perhaps not a connoisseur of erotic ads, but even he can appreciate the following story printed in the Hartford Courant that established a direct connection between ads appearing in Connecticut’s media and prostitution.
A story that appeared in the Yale Daily News pointed to a connection between ads printed in one of the Advocate papers and a Korean sexual slavery sauna parlor that had been close down twice. Apparently, Mr. Blumenthal's alert investigators, alive to ads in a California ad-house missed "The best Little Whorehouse in New Haven," hard by Yale University.
If we add together the customers from the Korean sauna pallor with the customers associated with the prostitute covered by the Courant – who had $600,000 tucked away in a bank deposit box – the resulting figure may well exceed the number of attorneys working in Mr. Blumenthal’s office, very few of whom, including Mr. Blumenthal, appear to be alarmed by ads facilitating prostitution in Connecticut.
Ms. Altimari, who has produced a stunning story exploring the cozy relationship Mr. Blumenthal has enjoyed for the last 20 years with Connecticut’s sycophantic media did not spend too much time searching out erotic advertisements in Connecticut publications, links to which have been included in an addenda to her story:
In addition to holding down the post of attorney general, Mr. Blumenthal is also running for U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd’s soon to be vacant seat in congress. As a U.S. congressman, it has been supposed that Mr. Blumenthal likely would uphold the First Amendment rights that he, as attorney general, is vigorously attacking.
A Saturday screen shot showing the opening page of Craigslist's website for Hartford features a "censored" logo over what used to be the adult services section.
“Craigslist,” the San Francisco Chronicle reported, “apparently closed the section two weeks after 17 state attorneys general demanded it be shut down. Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, one of the AGs who pressed for the change, said in a written statement that he welcomed the change and was trying to verify Craigslist's official policy going forward.”
Ryan Calo, associated with the Center for Internet and Society and the Stanford Law School, has questioned Mr. Blumenthal’s participation in the Craigslist affair:
“As an initial matter, it is not clear what legal hook an AG would have. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act would appear to immunize Craigslist for the content posted on the site by its users. See 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) (‘No provider … of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.’). See also id. at §230(e)(3) (‘No cause of action may be brought and no liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.’). Our best guess is that Craigslist ultimately gave in to state AG demands not out of fear of losing a criminal trial, but due to the sheer prospect of facing investigations and lawsuits in multiple states, generating bad press and costing potentially thousands of dollars in defense fees regardless of outcome.
“Recall that attempts to restrict access to online pornography by adults on the basis of its alleged availability to children have repeatedly been struck down as unconstitutional under the First Amendment. See, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844, 875 (1997) (‘It is true that we have repeatedly recognized the governmental interest in protecting children from harmful materials . . . [b]ut that interest does not justify an unnecessarily broad suppression of speech addressed to adults.’).
Matt Zimmerman, senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, agrees:
"Craigslist isn't legally culpable for these posts, but the public pressure has increased and Craigslist is a small company. My guess is that they may have just decided that the public pressure was too big."Brian Carver, an attorney and assistant professor at the School of Information at UC Berkeley, cautions that the Blumenthal assault on First Amendment rights and well founded statutory law could have a chilling effect, according to a SFGate story:
“The broader concern is that making publishers responsible for the behavior of their users, whether through new laws or legal threats, will force them to adopt more conservative standards over what's allowed on their sites. That could have a chilling effect on online expression, said Brian Carver, an attorney and assistant professor at the School of Information at UC Berkeley.”
Others, including Mr. Blumenthal, worry that dissolving the adult services site will have the unfortunate effect of spreading the ads to other parts of Craigslist that will make monitoring less possible.
Mr. Blumenthal is famous for having said that his selective prosecution of companies “levels the playing field” for honest companies.
Some commentators have questioned why Mr. Blumenthal has not applied to Connecticut media outlets the same strictures he has urged Craigslist to adopt.
Hartford Courant reporter Daniela Altimari put this question to Mr. Blumenthal, drawing from the attorney general the following extenuating circumstances: 1) Although the Hartford Advocate chain of newspapers, which carries similar ads, is Connecticut based, craigslist is larger and “reaches more people.” Mr. Blumenthal has not said that the craigslist ads affect more customers living within Connecticut, the attorney general’s jurisdiction; 2) Some of the craigslist ads are more explicit than those in the Advocate chain of newspapers, the attorney general avers. In a previous blog, the following – very unsubtle – link to the Advocate ads was provided.
Mr. Blumenthal is perhaps not a connoisseur of erotic ads, but even he can appreciate the following story printed in the Hartford Courant that established a direct connection between ads appearing in Connecticut’s media and prostitution.
A story that appeared in the Yale Daily News pointed to a connection between ads printed in one of the Advocate papers and a Korean sexual slavery sauna parlor that had been close down twice. Apparently, Mr. Blumenthal's alert investigators, alive to ads in a California ad-house missed "The best Little Whorehouse in New Haven," hard by Yale University.
If we add together the customers from the Korean sauna pallor with the customers associated with the prostitute covered by the Courant – who had $600,000 tucked away in a bank deposit box – the resulting figure may well exceed the number of attorneys working in Mr. Blumenthal’s office, very few of whom, including Mr. Blumenthal, appear to be alarmed by ads facilitating prostitution in Connecticut.
Ms. Altimari, who has produced a stunning story exploring the cozy relationship Mr. Blumenthal has enjoyed for the last 20 years with Connecticut’s sycophantic media did not spend too much time searching out erotic advertisements in Connecticut publications, links to which have been included in an addenda to her story:
“An addendum to today's story on Blumenthal and the media: Why has Blumenthal gone after this and not this?”Mr Blumenthal may have his reasons; reasonable men usually do. But the reasons he has offered to Ms. Altimari don't hold water.
In addition to holding down the post of attorney general, Mr. Blumenthal is also running for U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd’s soon to be vacant seat in congress. As a U.S. congressman, it has been supposed that Mr. Blumenthal likely would uphold the First Amendment rights that he, as attorney general, is vigorously attacking.
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Is Obama A Liability?
Mr. Blumenthal’s statement is straightforward enough. Over a twenty year period, citizens of the state have come to expect straight-talk from Attorney General Blumenthal:
“I look forward to welcoming the President of the United States to Connecticut. It is an honor to have his support and his assistance. His visit will make a difference for us, energizing our supporters and helping us raise the resources we need against my opponent who is spending an unprecedented $50 million on her campaign.”A carefully crafted caveat was delivered by Blumenthal spokesman Marla Romash: “Dick has always said when he agrees with the President he’ll stand with him and when he doesn’t he won’t … The bottom line here is the most important thing for Dick has always been and always will be what’s best for Connecticut.”
And what’s best for Connecticut are dollars for Dick.
The Linda McMahon campaign, rather hoping to pin Blumenthal to Obama’s increasingly truncated coattails, issued its own caveat through press spokesman Ed Patru:
“Dick Blumenthal is just another politician. He hasn’t been honest about special interest money, and he supported a partisan assault on health care that was put together behind closed doors and now is costing us all. He supports the President’s national energy tax, and he supports higher taxes on Connecticut’s small businesses. We are not going to get our economy growing again by electing more politicians who don’t get it. More of the same is just not good enough.”
Earlier in the week, former Chairman of the Democratic Party John Droney, an old time political pugilist, was asked by Dennis House on “Face the State” whether he thought it was a good idea to invite Obama to Connecticut to campaign for Democrats. With refreshing honesty, Mr. Droney -- subbing on the program for the party’s semi-invisible chairwoman Nancy DiNardo – replied he did not think that would be helpful. Using Mr. Obama as a dollar magnet for Democratic candidates was, on the other hand, a horse of a different color.
There was a day when Mr. Obama could be relied upon to sent a chill up the leg of Chris Mathews, the formidable host of MSNBC’s “Hardball,” but this was during a campaign in which Mr. Obama, glancing nervously over his shoulder at Hillary Clinton, steered his ship towards a more moderate center, except on some few vote churning issues such as bringing troops home from the war in Iraq by the Spring of 2008, closing down GITMO weeks into his presidency and promising to devote quality time in the oval office to bringing in Osama bin Ladin -- dead or alive.
Since having been elected president, the national economy, perversely refusing to respond to Mr. Obama’s stimulus packages, continues to steam, full speed ahead, towards economic sand bars; the nation’s Gross National Product is heading for the cemetery; GITMO is still open for business; the war in Afghanistan, a collection of tribes sometime called the “graveyard of empires,” is proceeding apace; terrorists whose names no one can pronounce are being tried in military courts; the post-terrorist security apparatus in the United States continues to threaten the liberties of non-terrorist citizens; the trial in New York city of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9-11, has been derailed; Iran’s nuclear machinery, fine tuned both by China and Russia, will soon be fully functioning; the Democratic controlled U.S. Congress has passed, over the strenuous objections of minority Republicans, two massive spending programs; the Frankensteinian Dodd-Frank bill regulates many untidy corners of the economy but leaves Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac, the chief culprits of the Bush era economic collapse, unmarred by the Dodd-Frank regulatory deep sea squid.
Mr. Droney, and some few other concerned centrist Democrats, are necessarily queasy about all this.
The good news is that while perambulating around Waterbury (unemployment rate 14.4 percent), New Britain (13 percent) and Torrington (11 percent), knocking on doors and talking to non-millionaires in Connecticut’s 5th District, Democratic U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy has discovered “anecdotal signs” that the economy is recovering and that the Obama’s stimulus, “an appropriate blend of tax cuts and stimulus spending,” part of a larger vision in his party’s recovery strategy, has worked its magic.
Mr. Murphy’s Republican opponent, Sam Caliguiri, cool to Mr. Murphy’s anecdotal evidence, is convinced that his opponent, unable to read the signs of the times, has kissed reality goodbye.
While Mr. Murphy has not asked the president to campaign for him, he told the Housatonic Times, “I’d welcome him to come to Connecticut. It would be a great opportunity to focus national attention on the challenges people are facing in this tough economy.”
Republicans are likely to agree.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)